Maryland 1820 U.S. House of Representatives, District 8

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Maryland 1820 U.S. House of Representatives, District 8
Date:
1820
State:
Maryland
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Thomas Bayly, Charles Goldsborough, Samuel Banks, Enoch Sloan, Tristam Richardson, Thomas Williams, Caleb Griffin, John Lecompte, Greenburg L. Rawley, Ennals Rawsil, William C. Ridgeway, Noah Wheeler, Ephraim Williams
Candidates: Thomas Bayly[1]Charles GoldsboroughSamuel BanksEnoch SloanTristam RichardsonThomas WilliamsCaleb GriffinJohn LecompteGreenburg L. RawleyEnnals RawsilWilliam C. RidgewayNoah WheelerEphraim Williams
Affiliation:supported by both partiesFederalist
Final Result: 49391042221111111
District of Eight493910422211111-1
Dorchester County180510422-111111-
District of One367------------
District of Two[2]385------------
District of Three295------------
District of Four316------------
District of Five[3]442------------
Somerset County1188----2------1
District of One503------------
District of Two474----2------1
District of Three211------------
Worcester County1946------------

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]There were five votes cast for various other candidates in District 2.
[3]There were nineteen votes cast for various other candidates in District 5.

References:

Original Election Returns. Maryland State Archives, Annapolis.
Baltimore Patriot and Mercantile Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 10, 1820.
Maryland Gazette and Political Intelligencer (Annapolis, MD). October 19, 1820.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.