Ohio 1824 U.S. House of Representatives, District 3

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Ohio 1824 U.S. House of Representatives, District 3
Date:
1824
State:
Ohio
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
William MacLean, James Riley, Jeremiah Morrow, William Riley
Candidates: William MacLean[1]James RileyJeremiah MorrowWilliam Riley
Affiliation:
Final Result: [2]4066100811
District of Three4066100811
Darke County42153--
Adams274--
Butler442--
German37---
Greenville[3]1193--
Harrison592--
Neave51---
Richland329--
Twin217--
Washington22---
Wayne926--
Mercer County----
Saint Mary's291--
Miami County107042--
Montgomery County119365711
Butler7031--
Dayton346208--
German15093--
Jackson5936-1
Jefferson6697--
Madison4541--
Perry1818--
Randolph3059--
Washington347651-
Wayne629--
Preble County----
Shelby County[4]30111--
Clinton59---
Cythiana109--
Green32---
Laramie14---
Orange62---
Perry40---
Turtle Creek842--
Williams County----

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]The Hamilton Advertister lists James Riley with 1003 votes.
[3]The Dayton Watchman or Farmer and Mechanics' Journal (Dayton, OH) lists William MacLean with 120 votes.
[4]The Dayton Watchman or Farmer and Mechanics' Journal (Dayton, OH) lists William MacLean with 281 votes.

References:

Abstract of Votes, Darke County.
Original Shelby County Election Returns.
Miami Republican and Dayton Advertiser (Dayton, OH). October 19, 1824.
Dayton Watchman or Farmer and Mechanics' Journal (Dayton, OH). October 19, 1824.
Cleaveland Herald (Cleveland, OH). November 12, 1824.
The Columbus Gazette (Columbus, OH). December 22, 1824.
Cleaveland Herald (Cleveland, OH). January 7, 1825.
Sandusky Clarion (Sandusky, OH). January 8, 1825.
Hamilton Advertiser (Hamilton, OH). January 17, 1825.
Mikesell, Shirley Keller, ed. Early Settlers of Montgomery County, Ohio. Vol. III. Bowie, MD: Heritage Books, 1993. 108.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.