Maryland 1824 U.S. House of Representatives, District 3

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Maryland 1824 U.S. House of Representatives, District 3
Date:
1824
State:
Maryland
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
George Peter, George C. Washington, Henry R. Warfield
Candidates: George Peter[1]George C. WashingtonHenry R. Warfield
Affiliation:RepublicanFederalistFederalist
Final Result: [2][3]160214481226
Town of Three160214481226
Frederick County830775964
Town of Buckeystown71966
Town of Liberty82120277
Town of New Market185108163
Town of Taneytown188253128
Town of Westminster264189155
Town of Woodsborough10486175
Montgomery County772673262

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]The Daily National Intelligencer, the Maryland Republican and the October 16th edition of the Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA) list 1444 votes for George C. Washington and 1223 votes for Henry R. Warfield.
[3]The Federal Gazette lists 1592 votes for George Peter, 1441 votes for George C. Washington and 1193 votes for Henry C. Warfield.

References:

Original Election Returns. Maryland State Archives, Annapolis.
Political Examiner and Public Advertiser (Fredericktown, MD). October 6, 1824.
American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 7, 1824.
Daily National Intelligencer (Washington, DC). October 8, 1824.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 9, 1824.
Frederick-Town Herald (Fredericktown, MD). October 9, 1824.
The Maryland Republican and Political and Agricultural Museum (Annapolis, MD). October 9, 1824.
The Reservoir and Public Reflector (Fredericktown, MD). October 11, 1824.
The Torch Light and Public Advertiser (Hagerstown, MD). October 12, 1824.
American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 15, 1824.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). October 16, 1824.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.