Ohio 1806 U.S. House of Representatives

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Ohio 1806 U.S. House of Representatives
Date:
1806
State:
Ohio
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Jeremiah Morrow, James Pritchard, Chapman Arthur, Jacob Burnett, Michael Fame, W. Donham
Candidates: Jeremiah Morrow[1]James PritchardJacob BurnettChapman ArthurMichael FameW. Donham
Affiliation:RepublicanFederalist/Quid
Final Result: [2]673523646111
Adams County[3]42527----
Athens County51--1--
Ames27--1--
Alexander24-----
Belmont County899-----
Butler County27193----
Clermont County51836-11
Columbiana County283127----
Fairfield County553269----
Franklin County63220----
Gallia County81-----
Gallipolis48-----
Keger------
Letarts13-----
Ohio------
Rackoon20-----
Salisbury------
Geauga County[4]------
Greene County[5]2817----
Hamilton County73579----
Highland County[6][7]69104----
Jefferson County793367----
Montgomery County258145----
Dayton7223----
Elizabeth[8]------
German6319----
Harding43-----
Jefferson1372----
Randolph-31----
Washington67-----
Muskingum County328-----
Ross County416825----
Colerain160----
Concord2323----
Deerfield1545----
Franklin144----
Green1890----
Jefferson1153----
Mifflin-37----
Paxton-46----
Pee Pee-31----
Pickaway4111----
Salt Lick3620----
Scioto97143----
Twin399----
Union58103----
Washington-25----
Wayne935----
Scioto County[9]------
Trumbull County[10]------
Warren County46998----
Washington County242-----
Adams44-----
Bellpre20-----
Grandview13-----
Marietta94-----
Newport21-----
Salem50-----

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]Both candidates were Republicans, but from election articles published in The Scioto Gazette it was suggested that James Pritchard was the candidate of the Ohio Quids and that in a few counties, notably Columbiana and Jefferson, he was also supported by the Federalists.
[3]Several newspapers list Jeremiah Morrow with 523 votes.
[4]Geauga County made no return within the period prescribed by law and so was not included.
[5]Includes Champaign County.
[6]Several newspapers list Jeremiah Morrow with 69 votes and James Pritchard with 104 votes, but A History of the Early Settlement of Highland County, Ohio notes "the official returns of this election on file in the Clerk's office of this county, show that Jeremiah Morrow receieved one hundred and sixteen votes for Congress and James Prichard one hundred and twenty-two."
[7]The Liberty Hall (Cincinatti) lists James Pritchard with 104 votes.
[8]The votes from Elizabeth Township were declared illegal and thrown out.
[9]Scioto County instead of making a return to Adams, as directed by law, made it improperly to the Secretary of State and so was not included.
[10]Trumbull County made no return within the period prescribed by law and so was not included.

References:

Original Montgomery County Election Returns.
Original Washington County Election Returns.
Washington County Poll Book.
Washington County Tally Sheet for 1806 Election.
The Scioto Gazette (Chillicothe, OH). October 17, 1806.
Liberty Hall and Cincinnati Mercury (Cincinnati, OH). October 21, 1806.
The Western Spy, and Miami Gazette (Cincinnati, OH). October 21, 1806.
The Scioto Gazette (Chillicothe, OH). October 23, 1806.
Ohio Herald (Chillicothe, OH). October 25, 1806.
The Western Herald (Steubenville, OH). October 25, 1806.
Liberty Hall and Cincinnati Mercury (Cincinnati, OH). October 28, 1806.
The Scioto Gazette (Chillicothe, OH). October 30, 1806.
Liberty Hall and Cincinnati Mercury (Cincinnati, OH). November 4, 1806.
The Scioto Gazette (Chillicothe, OH). November 6, 1806.
Liberty Hall and Cincinnati Mercury (Cincinnati, OH). November 11, 1806.
The Scioto Gazette (Chillicothe, OH). November 13, 1806.
Ohio Herald (Chillicothe, OH). November 15, 1806.
Liberty Hall and Cincinnati Mercury (Cincinnati, OH). November 18, 1806.
Liberty Hall and Cincinnati Mercury (Cincinnati, OH). November 25, 1806.
Mikesell, Shirley Keller, ed. Early Settlers of Montgomery County, Ohio. Vol. III. Bowie, MD: Heritage Books, 1993. 93.
Scott, Daniel. A History of the Early Settlement of Highland County, Ohio. Hillsboro, OH: The Gazette, 1890. 131.
History of Clermont County. Philadelphia: Louis H. Everts, 1880. 124.
The Old Northwest Genealogical Quarterly. IX. (1906) 101.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.