South Carolina 1816 U.S. House of Representatives, District 9

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
South Carolina 1816 U.S. House of Representatives, District 9
Date:
1816
State:
South Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Stephen D. Miller, William Mayrant
Candidates: Stephen D. Miller[1]William Mayrant
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublican
Final Result: [2][3]2326836
District of Nine2326836
District of Chesterfield33844
District of Kershaw74357
District of Lancaster[4]69040
District of Sumter455695
District of Claremont431381
District of Clarendon124314

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]District Nine was also known as Sumter or Camden District.
[3]United States Congressional Elections, 1788-1997 lists William Mayrant as a Federalist in this election.
[4]The Charleston Courier lists 660 votes for Stephen D. Miller and 60 votes for William Mayrant.

References:

Original Election Returns. South Carolina Department of Archives and History, Columbia.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). September 28, 1816.
Camden Gazette (Camden, SC). October 17, 1816.
Southern Patriot, and Commercial Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 23, 1816.
Camden Gazette (Camden, SC). October 24, 1816.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). October 24, 1816.
City Gazette and Commercial Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 24, 1816.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). October 25, 1816.
The Times (Charleston, SC). October 25, 1816.
The Telescope (Columbia, SC). October 29, 1816.
Dubin, Michael J. United States Congressional Elections, 1788-1997: The Official Results of the Elections of the 1st through 105th Congresses. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company, 1998. 60.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.