South Carolina 1804 U.S. House of Representatives, District 3

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
South Carolina 1804 U.S. House of Representatives, District 3
Date:
1804
State:
South Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
David R. Williams, Robert Witherspoon, Joseph Blyth
Candidates: David R. Williams[1]Robert WitherspoonJoseph Blyth
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublicanRepublican
Final Result: [2]919460206
District of Three919460206
District of Darlington446362
District of Georgetown[3]192198
Black Mingo8132
Town of Santee11127
District of Horry-378
All Saints Parish-378
District of Marion2418121
District of Marlborough1211485
District of Williamsburg921712
Indian Town7752
Kings Tree8596-

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]District Three was also known as Georgetown District.
[3]The Charleston Times lists no votes for David Williams, 7 votes for Robert Witherspoon, and 69 votes for Joseph Blyth.

References:

Aurora. General Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). October 6, 1804.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). October 10, 1804.
City Gazette (Charleston, SC). October 10, 1804.
The Times (Charleston, SC). October 17, 1804.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). October 18, 1804.
City Gazette (Charleston, SC). October 19, 1804.
The Times (Charleston, SC). October 19, 1804.
City Gazette (Charleston, SC). October 20, 1804.
The Times (Charleston, SC). October 20, 1804.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). November 2, 1804.
The True American and Commercial Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). November 2, 1804.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.