South Carolina 1803 U.S. House of Representatives, District 1

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
South Carolina 1803 U.S. House of Representatives, District 1
Date:
1803
State:
South Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Thomas Lowndes, Robert Marion
Candidates: Thomas Lowndes[1]Robert Marion
Affiliation:FederalistRepublican
Final Result: [2]422385
District of One422385
District of Charleston422385
City of Charleston[3]329249
Saint Michael Parish--
Saint Philip Parish--
Christ Church Parish128
Saint James Goose Creek Parish493
Saint John's Berkeley Parish1341
Saint Stephen's Parish414

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]District One was also known as Charleston District.
[3]There were 3 lost votes in Saint Philip and Saint Michael.

References:

The Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). February 9, 1803.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). February 9, 1803.
The Times (Charleston, SC). February 9, 1803.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). February 10, 1803.
The Times (Charleston, SC). February 10, 1803.
The Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). February 11, 1803.
The Times (Charleston, SC). February 18, 1803.
The Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). February 19, 1803.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). March 10, 1803.
Georgia. The Augusta Chronicle and Gazette of the State (Augusta, GA). March 12, 1803.
Petersburg Intelligencer (Petersburg, VA). March 15, 1803.
The Carolina Gazette (Charleston, SC). March 24, 1803.
Universal Gazette (Washington, DC). March 24, 1803.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.