North Carolina 1823 U.S. House of Representatives, District 10

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
North Carolina 1823 U.S. House of Representatives, District 10
Date:
1823
State:
North Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
John Long, John MacClelland
Candidates: John Long[1]John MacClelland
Affiliation:
Final Result: 33081640
District of Ten33081640
Chatham County1132168
Davidson County756448
Daniel's13734
Hains22778
Hamptons12314
Lexington172318
Wards974
Randolph County98613
Ashborough43-
Col. Lanes1436
Harris's136-
Hoovers884
Ingram's1291
Johnstonville261-
Joseph Lanes1272
Little River59-
Rowan County4341011

Notes:

[1]Elected.

References:

Original Election Returns. State Archives of North Carolina, Raleigh.
Western Carolinian (Salisbury, NC). August 19, 1823.
Western Carolinian (Salisbury, NC). August 26, 1823.
Western Carolinian (Salisbury, NC). September 2, 1823.
Southern Chronicle (Camden, SC). September 10, 1823.
Hinshaw, Seth Beeson, ed. North Carolina Election Returns 1790-1866: Covering the Races for President, Governor and U.S. House. 1992. State Library of North Carolina, Raleigh.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.