North Carolina 1813 U.S. House of Representatives, District 9

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
North Carolina 1813 U.S. House of Representatives, District 9
Date:
1813
State:
North Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Bartlett Yancey, James Martin
Candidates: Bartlett Yancey[1]James Martin
Affiliation:RepublicanFederalist
Final Result: [2]28111787
District of Nine28111787
Caswell County91513
Guilford County469839
Rockingham County794249
Stokes County633686

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]"Mr. Yancey is no doubt elected in this district, which is far gone with the war fever." Federal Republican, and Commercial Gazette (Georgetown, DC). May 12, 1813.

References:

Original Election Certificate. State Archives of North Carolina, Raleigh.
Original Election Returns. State Archives of North Carolina, Raleigh.
Stokes County Court Minutes. 1808-1814. State Archives of North Carolina, Raleigh.
The Raleigh Minerva (Raleigh, NC). May 7, 1813.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina Gazette (Raleigh, NC). May 7, 1813.
The Star (Raleigh, NC). May 7, 1813.
The Carolina Federal Republican (New Bern, NC). May 8, 1813.
The Edenton Gazette (Edenton, NC). May 11, 1813.
Federal Republican, and Commercial Gazette (Georgetown, DC). May 12, 1813.
Alexandria Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA). May 13, 1813.
The Raleigh Minerva (Raleigh, NC). May 14, 1813.
Petersburg Intelligencer (Petersburg, VA). May 18, 1813.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina Gazette (Raleigh, NC). May 21, 1813.
The Star (Raleigh, NC). May 21, 1813.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). May 22, 1813.
Hinshaw, Seth Beeson, ed. North Carolina Election Returns 1790-1866: Covering the Races for President, Governor and U.S. House. 1992. State Library of North Carolina, Raleigh.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.