Virginia 1801 U.S. House of Representatives, District 11

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Virginia 1801 U.S. House of Representatives, District 11
Date:
1801
State:
Virginia
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Thomas Newton, Jr., John Niveson, Josiah Parker
Candidates: Thomas Newton, Jr.[1]John NivesonJosiah Parker
Affiliation:RepublicanFederalistFederalist
Final Result: [2][3]905557
District of Eleven905557
Isle of Wight County-164
Nansemond County279--
Norfolk County41643
Norfolk2561-
Princess Anne County21035-

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]"For a Member of Congress...T. Newton, jun. 905, J. Niveson 37, J. Parker 3...No correct returns have been received from the Isle of Wight, but we are told that Mr. Newton lost but 20 votes." Epitome of the Times (Norfolk, VA). April 24, 1801.
[3]National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC), May 1, 1801, and The Daily Advertiser (New York, NY), May 7, 1801, give 935 votes for Newton, 37 votes for Niveson and 3 votes for Parker.

References:

Original Election Returns. Library of Virginia, Richmond.
Epitome of the Times (Norfolk, VA). April 24, 1801.
Epitome of the Times (Norfolk, VA). April 28, 1801.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). May 1, 1801.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). May 1, 1801.
The Daily Advertiser (New York, NY). May 7, 1801.
The Albany Register (Albany, NY). June 2, 1801.
Georgia. The Augusta Chronicle and Gazette of the State (Augusta, GA). June 13, 1801.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.