Virginia 1822 State Senate, Class 1, District 3

Office:
State Senate (State)
Title:
State Senator
Jurisdiction:
State
Label:
Virginia 1822 State Senate, Class 1, District 3
Date:
1822
State:
Virginia
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
State Senate/State Senator
Candidates:
William Browne, John B. Clopton, Brazure W. Pryor
Candidates: William BrowneJohn B. CloptonBrazure W. Pryor
Affiliation:
Final Result: [1]932811-
District of Three932811-
Charles City County12294-
Elizabeth City County[2]151272
Henrico County176380-
City of Richmond110145-
James City County[3]15215-
New Kent County[4]64241-
Warwick County5319-
City of Williamsburg[5]8610-
York County12825-

Notes:

[1]The Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA) lists 933 votes for William Browne.
[2]The Norfolk and Portsmouth Herald (Norfolk, VA) and Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA) of April 26 report 152 votes for William Browne in Elizabeth City County.
[3]The Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA) of May 7 lists 18 votes for John B. Clopton.
[4]Richmond Daily Mercantile Advertiser (Richmond, VA) of April 17 lists 211 votes for John B. Clopton.
[5]At the time, Williamsburg was split between James City County and York County and was not yet an independent city. The votes in Williamsburg appear to have been reported independently of either county.

References:

Elizabeth City Deeds. Vol. 32. 395-399. Library of Virginia, Richmond.
Richmond Daily Mercantile Advertiser (Richmond, VA). April 2, 1822.
American Commercial Beacon and Norfolk and Portsmouth Daily Advertiser (Norfolk, VA). April 5, 1822.
The Virginia Herald (Fredericksburg, VA). April 6, 1822.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 12, 1822.
American Commercial Beacon and Norfolk and Portsmouth Daily Advertiser (Norfolk, VA). April 15, 1822.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 16, 1822.
American Commercial Beacon and Norfolk and Portsmouth Daily Advertiser (Norfolk, VA). April 17, 1822.
Richmond Daily Mercantile Advertiser (Richmond, VA). April 17, 1822.
Richmond Daily Mercantile Advertiser (Richmond, VA). April 18, 1822.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 19, 1822.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 23, 1822.
American Commercial Beacon and Norfolk and Portsmouth Daily Advertiser (Norfolk, VA). April 24, 1822.
American Commercial Beacon and Norfolk and Portsmouth Daily Advertiser (Norfolk, VA). April 26, 1822.
The Norfolk and Portsmouth Herald (Norfolk, VA). April 26, 1822.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 26, 1822.
Richmond Daily Mercantile Advertiser (Richmond, VA). April 29, 1822.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 30, 1822.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). May 3, 1822.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). May 7, 1822.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.