South Carolina 1820 U.S. House of Representatives, District 9

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
South Carolina 1820 U.S. House of Representatives, District 9
Date:
1820
State:
South Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
John S. Richardson
Candidates: John S. Richardson[1]
Affiliation:
Final Result: [2][3]-
District of Nine-
District of Chesterfield-
District of Kershaw492
District of Lancaster-
District of Sumter-
District of Claremont-
District of Clarendon357

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]John S. Richardson is elected without opposition.
[3]"For the united Districts of Lancaster, Kershaw, Sumter, and Chesterfield - John S. Richardson, elected in place of Judge Brevard who declined re-election." City Gazette and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). November 4, 1820.

References:

Original Election Returns. South Carolina Department of Archives and History, Columbia.
Camden Gazette and Mercantile Advertiser (Camden, SC). October 19, 1820.
Southern Patriot, and Commercial Advertiser (Charleston, SC). November 3, 1820.
City Gazette and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). November 4, 1820.
City Gazette and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). December 12, 1820.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). December 13, 1820.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.