South Carolina 1806 U.S. House of Representatives, District 4

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
South Carolina 1806 U.S. House of Representatives, District 4
Date:
1806
State:
South Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
John Taylor, Henry Dana Ward, Miles B. Pinckney, scattering
Candidates: John Taylor[1]Henry Dana WardMiles B. Pinckneyscattering
Affiliation:RepublicanFederalistRepublican
Final Result: 9575202478
District of Four9575202478
District of Colleton3621692318
Saint Bartholomew's Parish[2]4251223-
Saint George, Dorchester Parish[3]105-890
Saint Matthew' Parish13118--
Saint Paul's Parish8120--
Forks of Edisto380--
District of Lexington229169-
District of Orangeburgh82314--
District of Richland287116-

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]Newspaper sources list Miles B. Pinckney with 232 votes.
[3]The Charleston Times reports 8 lost votes in Saint George, Dorchester.

References:

Original Election Returns. South Carolina Department of Archives and History, Columbia.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). October 16, 1806.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 16, 1806.
The Times (Charleston, SC). October 17, 1806.
The South-Carolina State Gazette, and Columbian Advertiser (Columbia, SC). October 18, 1806.
The Times (Charleston, SC). October 21, 1806.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). October 24, 1806.
The Times (Charleston, SC). October 24, 1806.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 25, 1806.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). November 10, 1806.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). December 1, 1806.
The Times (Charleston, SC). December 6, 1806.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). December 8, 1806.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). December 8, 1806.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.