South Carolina 1806 U.S. House of Representatives, District 1

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
South Carolina 1806 U.S. House of Representatives, District 1
Date:
1806
State:
South Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Robert Marion, William Loughton Smith, James Lowndes, Charles Pinckney, John Rutledge, Thomas Simmons
Candidates: Robert Marion[1]William Loughton SmithJames LowndesCharles PinckneyJohn RutledgeThomas Simmons
Affiliation:RepublicanFederalist
Final Result: [2][3]7415818111
District of One7415818111
City of Charleston[4]5214821-1-
Saint Michael Parish------
Saint Philip Parish------
Christ Church Parish383-1--
Saint Andrew's Parish723----
Saint James Goose Creek Parish598----
Saint James Santee Parish31-----
Saint John's Berkeley Parish487----
Saint John's Colleton Parish22387--1
Saint Stephen's Parish15-----
Saint Dennis and Saint Thomas Parish120----

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]District One was also known as Charleston District.
[3]The City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC) lists a scattering of 21 votes.
[4]There were 15 lost votes.

References:

Original Election Returns. South Carolina Department of Archives and History, Columbia.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). October 15, 1806.
The Times (Charleston, SC). October 15, 1806.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). October 16, 1806.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 16, 1806.
The South-Carolina State Gazette, and Columbian Advertiser (Columbia, SC). October 18, 1806.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 23, 1806.
The Times (Charleston, SC). October 23, 1806.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). October 24, 1806.
The True American and Commercial Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). November 1, 1806.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). November 10, 1806.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). December 1, 1806.
The Times (Charleston, SC). December 6, 1806.
The Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). December 8, 1806.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). December 8, 1806.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.