Virginia 1803 U.S. House of Representatives, District 20

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Virginia 1803 U.S. House of Representatives, District 20
Date:
1803
State:
Virginia
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Thomas Newton, Jr., Alexander Martin
Candidates: Thomas Newton, Jr.[1]Alexander Martin
Affiliation:Republican
Final Result: [2][3][4]1157-
District of Twenty1157-
Nansemond County196-
Norfolk County732-
Norfolk3282
Princess Anne County229-

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]"In Virginia...In Norfolk District Thomas Newton is re-elected without opposition." Salem Register (Salem, MA). May 12, 1803.
[3]The Albany Centinel (Albany, NY), American Citizen (New York, NY), City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC), Hudson Gazette (Hudson, NY) and National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC) give vote as 1159 for Thomas Newton.
[4]The Norfolk Herald (Norfolk, VA) lists 1158 votes for Thomas Newton, Jun.

References:

Princess Anne County Deeds. Book 8. 299-303.
The Norfolk Herald (Norfolk, VA). April 19, 1803.
Petersburg Intelligencer (Petersburg, VA). April 22, 1803.
Alexandria Advertiser and Commercial Intelligencer (Alexandria, VA). April 26, 1803.
The Norfolk Herald (Norfolk, VA). April 26, 1803.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). April 27, 1803.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). April 30, 1803.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). May 2, 1803.
The True American and Commercial Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). May 4, 1803.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). May 6, 1803.
American Citizen (New York, NY). May 10, 1803.
Salem Register (Salem, MA). May 12, 1803.
Hudson Gazette (Hudson, NY). May 17, 1803.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). May 18, 1803.
The Albany Centinel (Albany, NY). May 20, 1803.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.