Ohio 1816 U.S. House of Representatives, District 4

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Ohio 1816 U.S. House of Representatives, District 4
Date:
1816
State:
Ohio
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Samuel Herrick, John C. Wright, John MacGlaughlin, Bezeleel Wells, John Branen, John Stokes, James Caldwell
Candidates: Samuel Herrick[1]John C. WrightJohn MacGlaughlinBezeleel WellsJohn BranenJohn StokesJames Caldwell
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublican
Final Result: 30682226163221
District of Four30682226163221
Belmont County887271-----
Coshocton County51305-----
Coshocton[2]4135-----
Oxford1721-----
Guernsey County60756-----
Harrison County[3]50448163221
Archer-44-----
Cadiz11301222-
Freeport-51-----
Green367----1
North323-----
Nottingham-42-1---
Rock121-----
Short Creek127115----
Stock119-----
Jefferson County2801067-----
Cross Creek18132-----
Island Creek2108-----
Knox3127-----
Mount Pleasant607-----
Ross-45-----
Salem26109-----
Smithfield4155-----
Springfield-41-----
Steubenville21260-----
Warren9464-----
Wayne15119-----
Monroe County5159-----
Muskingum County114234-----
Blue Rock19------
Clayton27------
Falls86------
Harrison28------
Highland17------
Hopewell60------
Jackson1713-----
Jefferson375-----
Licking100------
Madison78------
Newton81------
Rich Hill17------
Salt Creek36------
Springfield[4]105------
Union[5]70------
West Zanesville34------
Zanesville33016-----

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]The Supporter (Chillicothe, OH) lists John C. Wright with 131 votes.
[3]The Western Herald (Steubenville, OH), Zanesville Express, and Republican Standard (Zanesville, OH) and Muskingum Messenger (Zanesville, OH) list John C. Wright with 434 votes.
[4]The October 10, 1816 edition of the Zanesville Express, and Republican Standard (Zanesville, OH) lists the Springfield results as being from Putnam township.
[5]The October 10, 1816 edition of the Zanesville Express, and Republican Standard (Zanesville, OH) lists Samuel Herrick with 64 votes and John C. Wright with 1 vote in Union township.

References:

Original Coshocton Township, Coshocton County Election Returns.
Original Oxford Township, Coshocton County Election Returns. Ebay Item #394451452, Auction Ended, August 6, 2000.
Reconstructed Abstract of Votes, Harrison County.
Zanesville Express, and Republican Standard (Zanesville, OH). October 10, 1816.
The Western Herald (Steubenville, OH). October 11, 1816.
Muskingum Messenger (Zanesville, OH). October 17, 1816.
Zanesville Express, and Republican Standard (Zanesville, OH). October 17, 1816.
The Western Herald (Steubenville, OH). October 18, 1816.
The Supporter (Chillicothe, OH). October 22, 1816.
Muskingum Messenger (Zanesville, OH). October 24, 1816.
Zanesville Express, and Republican Standard (Zanesville, OH). October 24, 1816.
The Western Herald (Steubenville, OH). October 25, 1816.
Muskingum Messenger (Zanesville, OH). September 23, 1818.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.