Maryland 1816 Electoral College, District 8

Office:
Electoral College (Federal)
Title:
Elector
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Maryland 1816 Electoral College, District 8
Date:
1816
State:
Maryland
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
Electoral College/Elector
Electors:
Thomas Ennalls, John Bennett
Electors: Thomas Ennalls[1]John Bennett
Affiliation:FederalistRepublican
Presidential Candidate:Rufus KingJames Monroe
Final Result: [2]13381272
District of Eight[3]13381272
Caroline County587446
Dorchester County[4][5]101265
Talbot County650561
Chappel14988
Town of Easton184206
Saint Michaels141139
Trappe176128

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]Thomas Ennalls did not actually vote for Rufus King in the Electoral College. Instead, he cast a blank vote as a protest to James Monroe.
[3]Presidential Election in Maryland lists 1282 votes for John Bennett.
[4]Presidential Election in Maryland lists 275 votes for John Bennett.
[5]Presidential Returns lists 267 votes for Thomas Ennalls and 343 votes for John Bennett.

References:

Original Election Returns. Maryland State Archives, Annapolis.
George W. Archer Historical Scrapbooks. Historical Society of Harford County, Bel Air.
National Intelligencer (Washington, DC). June 24, 1816.
The American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). November 12, 1816.
Baltimore Patriot and Evening Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). November 12, 1816.
Republican Star or General Advertiser (Easton, MD). November 12, 1816.
Baltimore Patriot and Evening Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). November 18, 1816.
Willis, John T. Presidential Elections in Maryland. Mt. Airy, MD: Lomond Publications, 1984. 166.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.