Maryland 1809 House of Delegates, Talbot County

Office:
House of Delegates (State)
Title:
Delegate
Jurisdiction:
State
Label:
Maryland 1809 House of Delegates, Talbot County
Date:
1809
State:
Maryland
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
House of Delegates/Delegate
Candidates:
Samuel Stevens Jr., David Kerr Jr., Perry Spencer, William E. Seth, John Edmondson, Edward Martin, Robert H. Goldsborough, James Goldsborough
Candidates: Samuel Stevens Jr.[1]David Kerr Jr.Perry SpencerWilliam E. SethJohn EdmondsonEdward MartinRobert H. GoldsboroughJames Goldsborough
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublicanRepublicanRepublicanFederalistFederalistFederalistFederalist
Final Result: [2][3]804798771768617597595589
Talbot County804798771768617597595589
Chapell161162153159150143146145
Town of Easton258259247239150130134130
Saint Michaels[4]207202201199164160162161
Trappe178175170171153164153153

Notes:

[1]Referred to as Mr. Stephens in the Frederick-Town Herald (Fredericktown, MD).
[2]The Republican Star or Eastern Shore General Advertiser (Easton, MD) October 10, 1809 has the following vote totals: John Edmondson, 614 and James Goldsborough, 594.
[3]The Hagers-Town Gazette (Hagerstown, MD) has the following vote totals: William E. Seth 763 votes and Edward Martin 567 votes.
[4]The American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD), October 6, 1809, reports 202 votes for Perry Spencer.

References:

Republican Star or Eastern Shore General Advertiser (Easton, MD). October 3, 1809.
Federal Republican and Commercial Gazette (Baltimore, MD). October 5, 1809.
American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 6, 1809.
Frederick-Town Herald (Fredericktown, MD). October 7, 1809.
The Maryland Republican (Annapolis, MD). October 7, 1809.
The People's Monitor (Easton, MD). October 7, 1809.
Republican Star or Eastern Shore General Advertiser (Easton, MD). October 10, 1809.
Hagers-Town Gazette (Hagerstown, MD). October 17, 1809.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.