Virginia 1819 U.S. House of Representatives, District 10

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Virginia 1819 U.S. House of Representatives, District 10
Date:
1819
State:
Virginia
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
George F. Strother, John Shackleford, John Wharton
Candidates: George F. Strother[1]John ShacklefordJohn Wharton
Affiliation:RepublicanFederalistRepublican
Final Result: 5815419
District of Ten5819541
Culpeper County[2][3][4]2892289
Fauquier County292313-

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]Virginia Patriot, and Richmond Daily Mercantile Advertiser (Richmond, VA) of April 28 lists 227 votes for John Shackleford in Culpeper County.
[3]Daily National Intelligencer (Washington, DC) of April 29 lists 283 for George F. Strother.
[4]Palladium of Liberty (Warrenton, VA) lists 6 votes for John Wharton and 227 votes for John Shackleford.

References:

American Commercial Beacon and Norfolk and Portsmouth Daily Advertiser (Norfolk, VA). April 13, 1819.
Palladium of Liberty (Warrenton, VA). April 23, 1819.
The Virginia Herald (Fredericksburg, VA). April 24, 1819.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 27, 1819.
Virginia Patriot, and Richmond Daily Mercantile Advertiser (Richmond, VA). April 28, 1819.
Daily National Intelligencer (Washington, DC). April 29, 1819.
Alexandria Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Alexandria, VA). April 30, 1819.
Daily National Intelligencer (Washington, DC). April 30, 1819.
Palladium of Liberty (Warrenton, VA). April 30, 1819.
The Virginia Herald (Fredericksburg, VA). May 1, 1819.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). May 4, 1819.
Virginia Patriot, and Richmond Daily Mercantile Advertiser (Richmond, VA). May 5, 1819.
American Commercial Beacon and Norfolk and Portsmouth Daily Advertiser (Norfolk, VA). May 7, 1819.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.