Massachusetts 1810 U.S. Senate, State Senate Vote, Ballot 4

Office:
U.S. Senate (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Senator
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Massachusetts 1810 U.S. Senate, State Senate Vote, Ballot 4
Date:
1810
State:
Massachusetts
Type:
Legislative
Iteration:
Fourth Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. Senate/U.S. Senator
Candidates:
Timothy Pickering, Joseph B. Varnum, William King, Richard Cutts
Candidates: Timothy PickeringJoseph B. VarnumWilliam KingRichard Cutts
Affiliation:Federalist
Final Result: 201541
State Senate[1]201541

Notes:

[1]No senator was elected for this session because no candidate was able to get a majority of the votes. A motion was made that the further consideration of the subject be postponed until the next session of the Legislature. The choice was postponed until the next meeting of the State Senate in January, 1811.

References:

Boston Patriot (Boston, MA). June 9, 1810.
Boston Patriot (Boston, MA). June 13, 1810.
Columbian Centinel. Massachusetts Federalist (Boston, MA). June 13, 1810.
Boston Patriot (Boston, MA). June 16, 1810.
Columbian Centinel. Massachusetts Federalist (Boston, MA). June 16, 1810.
The True American and Commercial Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). June 18, 1810.
Independent American (Georgetown, DC) June 19, 1810.
The Intelligencer, and Weekly Advertiser (Lancaster, PA). June 23, 1810.
Frederick-Town Herald (Fredericktown, MD). June 23, 1810.
The Republican and Savannah Evening Ledger (Savannah, GA). June 30, 1810.
The Republican and Savannah Evening Ledger (Savannah, GA). July 5, 1810.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.