South Carolina 1816 U.S. House of Representatives, District 3

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
South Carolina 1816 U.S. House of Representatives, District 3
Date:
1816
State:
South Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
James Ervin, Benjamin Huger
Candidates: James Ervin[1]Benjamin Huger
Affiliation:RepublicanFederalist
Final Result: [2][3]18041485
District of Three18041485
District of Darlington506201
District of Georgetown103156
District of Horry63518
All Saints Parish3153
District of Marion466270
Court House466270
District of Marlborough307303
District of Williamsburg35937

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]District Three was also known as Georgetown District.
[3]The Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA), 28 September 1816, lists Theodore Gourdin as an additional candidate.

References:

Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). September 28, 1816.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). October 21, 1816.
City Gazette and Commercial Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 21, 1816.
Southern Patriot, and Commercial Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 24, 1816.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). October 25, 1816.
City Gazette and Commercial Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 25, 1816.
The Times (Charleston, SC). October 25, 1816.
The Telescope (Columbia, SC). October 29, 1816.
Daily National Intelligencer (Washington, DC). November 1, 1816.
The Alexandria Herald (Alexandria, VA). November 6, 1816.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.