North Carolina 1819 U.S. House of Representatives, District 8

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
North Carolina 1819 U.S. House of Representatives, District 8
Date:
1819
State:
North Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
James S. Smith, Samuel Dickens
Candidates: James S. Smith[1]Samuel Dickens
Affiliation:RepublicanFederalist
Final Result: [2]25542126
District of Eight25542126
Orange County1324997
Cate's143104
Chapel Hill17181
Cochrans Stone3248
G. Carringtons77150
Hillsborough299191
Holt's12690
Jno. Carringtons5493
Kennon's Mill14183
MacCawley's4266
Mason Hall10921
Moulder's13070
Person County337372
Wake County[3]893757
A. Harrisons3050
B. Sanders2415
Delks142155
E. Tansells4498
Hortons103105
J. Burlees4319
J. Ligons637
J. Pullens2246
L. Cooks1153
N. Jones13262
Raleigh25495
Upchurches8222

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]Seth Beeson Hinshaw's Compilation, the National Intelligencer, the Virginia Patriot, and Richmond Daily Mercantile Advertiser (Richmond, VA) and the Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina Gazette (Raleigh, NC) all list Samuel Dickens with 2106 votes.
[3]Seth Beeson Hinshaw's Compilation and the Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina Gazette (Raleigh, NC) list Samuel Dickens with 737 votes.

References:

Original Election Returns. State Archives of North Carolina, Raleigh.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 20, 1819.
The Star, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 20, 1819.
National Intelligencer (Washington, DC). August 24, 1819.
Virginia Patriot, and Richmond Daily Mercantile Advertiser (Richmond, VA). August 27, 1819.
Hinshaw, Seth Beeson, ed. North Carolina Election Returns 1790-1866: Covering the Races for President, Governor and U.S. House. 1992. State Library of North Carolina, Raleigh.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.