Maryland 1800 Electoral College, District 5

Office:
Electoral College (Federal)
Title:
Elector
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Maryland 1800 Electoral College, District 5
Date:
1800
State:
Maryland
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
Electoral College/Elector
Electors:
Gabriel Duvall, Jeremiah T. Chase
Electors: Gabriel Duvall[1]Jeremiah T. Chase
Affiliation:RepublicanFederalist
Presidential Candidate:Thomas JeffersonJohn Adams
Final Result: 2379774
District of Five2379774
Anne Arundel County882336
District of One--
Lower18978
District of Two--
City of Annapolis206120
District of Three--
Severn12212
District of Four--
Spurrier's20425
District of Five--
Upper[2]161101
City of Baltimore[3][4]1497438
Ward One[5]285143
Ward Two--
Seal's18068
Ward Three[6]5358
Ward Four--
McKim's8037
Ward Five--
Exchange13227
Ward Six--
Otto's[7]15021
Ward Seven26729
Ward Eight--
Fell's Point[8][9]35055

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]The November 18, 1800 edition of the Balitmore American lists 160 votes for Gabriel Duvall.
[3]The November 12, 1800 edition of the National Intelligencer lists results for 7 Wards.
[4]The Centinel of Liberty lists 439 votes for Jeremiah. T. Chase.
[5]The Federal Gazette, The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA), Daily Advertiser and Columbian Mirror list 148 votes for Jeremiah. T. Chase.
[6]The Federal Gazette, Philadelpia Gazette, The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA), Daily Advertiser, Gazette of the United States and Columbian Mirror list 54 votes for Jeremiah T. Chase.
[7]The Federal Gazette, Philadelpia Gazette, Kline's Carlisle Weekly Gazette (Carlisle, PA), The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA), Daily Advertiser, American. And Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD), Gazette of the United States and Columbian Mirror list 160 votes for Gabriel Duvall.
[8]The Federal Gazette, Philadelpia Gazette, Kline's Carlisle Weekly Gazette (Carlisle, PA), The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA), Daily Advertiser, Gazette of the United States and Columbian Mirror list 340 votes for Gabriel Duvall.
[9]The November 11, 1800 edition of American. And Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD) lists 331 votes for Gabriel Duvall and 54 votes for Jeremiah T. Chase.

References:

Original Election Returns. Maryland State Archives, Annapolis.
Frederick County Pollbooks. Maryland State Archives, Annapolis.
Kent County Pollbooks. Maryland State Archives, Annapolis.
The American. And Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). November 11, 1800.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). November 11, 1800.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). November 12, 1800.
The American. And Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). November 13, 1800.
The Columbian Mirror and Alexandria Gazette (Alexandria, VA). November 13, 1800.
Gazette of the United States, and Daily Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). November 13, 1800.
The Maryland Herald, and Elizabeth-Town Advertiser (Elizabethtown, MD). November 13, 1800.
The Philadelphia Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). November 13, 1800.
The Centinel of Liberty, or George-town and Washington Advertiser (Georgetown, DC). November 14, 1800.
Gazette of the United States, and Daily Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). November 14, 1800.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). November 14, 1800.
The American. And Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). November 15, 1800.
The Columbian Mirror and Alexandria Gazette (Alexandria, VA). November 15, 1800.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). November 15, 1800.
Gazette of the United States, and Daily Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). November 15, 1800.
The Philadelphia Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). November 15, 1800.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). November 17, 1800.
The American. And Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). November 18, 1800.
Gazette of the United States, and Daily Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). November 18, 1800.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). November 18, 1800.
Kline's Carlisle Weekly Gazette (Carlisle, PA). November 19, 1800.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). November 20, 1800.
Gazette of the United States, and Daily Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). November 20, 1800.
The Maryland Gazette (Annapolis, MD). November 20, 1800.
The Maryland Herald, and Elizabeth-Town Advertiser (Elizabethtown, MD). November 20, 1800.
The New-York Gazette and General Advertiser (New York, NY). November 20, 1800.
Der Volks-Berichter; ein Yorker Wochenblatt (York, PA). November 20, 1800.
The City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). November 26, 1800.
The Maryland Gazette (Annapolis, MD). November 27, 1800.
South-Carolina State Gazette, and Timothy's Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). December 2, 1800.
Stewart's Kentucky Herald (Lexington, KY). December 2, 1800.
George W. Archer Historical Scrapbooks. Historical Society of Harford County, Bel Air.
Willis, John T. Presidential Elections in Maryland. Mt. Airy, MD: Lomond Publications, 1984. 162.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.