North Carolina 1815 U.S. House of Representatives, District 8

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
North Carolina 1815 U.S. House of Representatives, District 8
Date:
1815
State:
North Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Richard Stanford, Roger Tillman, scattering
Candidates: Richard Stanford[1]Roger Tillmanscattering
Affiliation:FederalistRepublican
Final Result: 2013182015
District of Eight2013182015
Orange County[2]1018929-
Cannon's Mill9796-
Cate's19634-
Chapel Hill8592-
G. Carrington's7342-
Hillsborough257237-
Holt's85105-
J. Carrington's2996-
Mason Hall23123-
MacCawley's5279-
Moulder's12125-
Person County308410-
Wake County[3]68748115
Banks'32211
Delk's19133-
Horton's15174-
Ligon's662411
N. Jones35110-
Raleigh1851753
Upchurch's2744-

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]The Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina Gazette (Raleigh, NC) lists Richard Stanford with 997 votes and Roger Tillman with 956 votes.
[3]The Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina Gazette (Raleigh, NC) lists Richard Stanford with 653 votes and Roger Tillman with 501 votes.

References:

Original Election Certificate. State Archives of North Carolina, Raleigh.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 11, 1815.
The Raleigh Minerva (Raleigh, NC). August 18, 1815.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 18, 1815.
The Raleigh Minerva (Raleigh, NC). August 25, 1815.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 25, 1815.
The Star (Raleigh, NC). August 25, 1815.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina Gazette (Raleigh, NC). September 1, 1815.
The Star (Raleigh, NC). September 1, 1815.
Hinshaw, Seth Beeson, ed. North Carolina Election Returns 1790-1866: Covering the Races for President, Governor and U.S. House. 1992. State Library of North Carolina, Raleigh.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.