Kentucky 1814 U.S. House of Representatives, District 8

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Kentucky 1814 U.S. House of Representatives, District 8
Date:
1814
State:
Kentucky
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Stephen Ormsby, James Moore, John Mavity
Candidates: Stephen Ormsby[1]James MooreJohn Mavity
Affiliation:
Final Result: [2][3]---
District of Eight---
Bullitt County---
Henry County---
Jefferson County---
Shelby County---

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]"In consequence of Dr. James Moore having consented to serve in the 8th Congessional district, Mr. John Mavity has declined offering. The candidates now are, Doctor James Moore and the Hon. Stephen Ormsby." Argus of Western America (Frankfort, KY). July 23, 1814.
[3]"Stephen Ormsby, by a small majority over Dr. J. Moore." The Reporter (Lexington, KY). August 12, 1814.

References:

Original Election Certificate. The National Archives, Washington, DC.
Argus of Western America (Frankfort, KY). June 11, 1814.
The Western Courier (Louisville, KY). July 11, 1814.
Argus of Western America (Frankfort, KY). July 23, 1814.
Argus of Western America (Frankfort, KY). August 6, 1814.
Kentucky Gazette (Lexington, KY). August 8, 1814.
The Reporter (Lexington, KY). August 12, 1814.
The Intelligencer, and Weekly Advertiser (Lancaster, PA). August 27, 1814.
The Intelligencer, and Weekly Advertiser (Lancaster, PA). September 3, 1814.
City Gazette and Commercial Advertiser (Charleston, SC). September 10, 1814.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.