Maryland 1822 U.S. House of Representatives, District 5

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Maryland 1822 U.S. House of Representatives, District 5
Date:
1822
State:
Maryland
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Peter Little, Samuel Smith, John Patterson
Candidates: Peter Little[1]Samuel Smith[2]John Patterson
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublicanRepublican
Final Result: [3][4][5][6][7]686667251973
District of Five686667251973
City of Baltimore[8][9][10]514355181374
Ward One274344116
Ward Two493509110
Ward Three666647104
Ward Four577591114
Ward Five31230362
Ward Six359451150
Ward Seven225318155
Ward Eight28333275
Ward Nine282362126
Ward Ten489575151
Ward Eleven495560140
Ward Twelve68856671
Baltimore County[11][12]17231207599
Buck's179986
Carter's35414555
Frost's16616959
Merryman's328266107
Nace's445846
Reistertown228228173
Shealy's185216113

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]Elected.
[3]Samuel Smith would not take a seat in the 18th Congress. He would be elected Senator in December of 1822 and resign his seat while the 17th Congress was still in session.
[4]The National Intelligencer and the Torch Light lists 6765 votes for Samuel Smith.
[5]The Maryland Herald lists 6867 votes for Peter Little and 6765 votes for Samuel Smith.
[6]The Maryland Republican lists 1972 votes for John Patterson.
[7]The Morning Chronicle lists 6867 votes for Peter Little, 6765 for Samuel Smith and 1874 votes for John Patterson.
[8]The Republican Star, the Maryland Gazette, the Maryland Gazette, the Easton Gazette (Easton, MD), the Frederick Gazette, the Maryland Republican, the October 8th edition of the Baltimore Patriot and Mercantile Advertiser (Baltimore, MD)., the October 11th edition Federal Republican, and the American and Commercial Daily Advertiser list 5558 votes for Samuel Smith. The October 11th edition of the Federal Republican also lists the correct results in the Official Returns.
[9]The Maryland Republican lists 1375 votes for John Patterson.
[10]The Morning Chronicle lists 5588 for Samuel Smith and 1275 votes for John Patterson.
[11]The Maryland Republican lists 1623 votes for Peter Little.
[12]The Maryland Herald and the Morning Chronicle list 1724 votes for Peter Little.

References:

Original Election Returns. Maryland State Archives, Annapolis.
American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 8, 1822.
Baltimore Patriot and Mercantile Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 8, 1822.
Morning Chronicle and Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 8, 1822.
Baltimore Patriot and Mercantile Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 9, 1822.
Morning Chronicle and Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 9, 1822.
American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 10, 1822.
Baltimore Patriot and Mercantile Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 10, 1822.
Maryland Gazette and Political Intelligencer (Annapolis, MD). October 10, 1822.
Federal Republican and Baltimore Telegraph (Baltimore, MD). October 11, 1822.
Easton Gazette (Easton, MD). October 12, 1822.
Republican Gazette and General Advertiser (Fredericktown, MD). October 12, 1822.
The Maryland Republican and Political and Agricultural Museum (Annapolis, MD). October 12, 1822.
National Intelligencer (Washington, DC). October 12, 1822.
Republican Star, or, General Advertiser (Easton, MD). October 15, 1822.
The Maryland Herald, and Hager's-Town Weekly Advertiser (Hagerstown, MD). October 15, 1822.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.