South Carolina 1824 U.S. House of Representatives, District 8

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
South Carolina 1824 U.S. House of Representatives, District 8
Date:
1824
State:
South Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Joseph Gist, James MacCreary, Francis W. Davie
Candidates: Joseph Gist[1]James MacCrearyFrancis W. Davie
Affiliation:CrawforditeAdamsJackson
Final Result: 36921869933
District of Eight36921869933
District of Chester345863177
District of Spartanburg1392572302
District of Union1389165156
District of York[2]566269298

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]The Charleston Courier and the Charleston Mercury, and Morning Advertiser (Charleston, SC) lists 566 votes for Joseph Gist, 298 votes for James MacCreary, and 268 votes for F. W. Davie.

References:

City Gazette and Commercial Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 13, 1824.
City Gazette and Commercial Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 14, 1824.
Southern Patriot, and Commercial Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 14, 1824.
City Gazette and Commercial Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 18, 1824.
The Pendleton Messenger (Pendleton, SC). October 20, 1824.
Southern Patriot, and Commercial Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 22, 1824.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). October 23, 1824.
Charleston Mercury, and Morning Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 23, 1824.
City Gazette and Commercial Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 23, 1824.
City Gazette and Commercial Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 25, 1824.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). October 25, 1824.
Southern Patriot, and Commercial Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 25, 1824.
The Democratic Press (Philadelphia, PA). November 2, 1824.
Georgia Journal (Milledgeville, GA). November 2, 1824.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). November 5, 1824.
Cheraw Intelligencer and Southern Register (Cheraw, SC). November 12, 1824.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.