North Carolina 1803 U.S. House of Representatives, District 9

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
North Carolina 1803 U.S. House of Representatives, District 9
Date:
1803
State:
North Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Marmaduke Williams, Theophilus Lacy, William Nash, Anton Brown
Candidates: Marmaduke Williams[1]Theophilus LacyWilliam NashAnton Brown
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublicanRepublicanFederalist
Final Result: 22921205659102
District of Nine22921205659102
Caswell County601135822
Guilford County3323172916
Person County1872815894
Randolph County8011216-
Rockingham County37147112-

Notes:

[1]Elected.

References:

Original Election Certificate. State Archives of North Carolina, Raleigh.
Compiled Congressional Returns. State Archives of North Carolina, Raleigh.
Minerva; or, Anti-Jacobin (Raleigh, NC). August 15, 1803.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 15, 1803.
Minerva; or, Anti-Jacobin (Raleigh, NC). August 22, 1803.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 22, 1803.
The Examiner (Richmond, VA). August 27, 1803.
Minerva; or, Anti-Jacobin (Raleigh, NC). August 29, 1803.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). August 29, 1803.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 29, 1803.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). September 5, 1803.
Hinshaw, Seth Beeson, ed. North Carolina Election Returns 1790-1866: Covering the Races for President, Governor and U.S. House. 1992. State Library of North Carolina, Raleigh.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.