Virginia 1811 U.S. House of Representatives, District 21

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Virginia 1811 U.S. House of Representatives, District 21
Date:
1811
State:
Virginia
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Hugh Nelson
Candidates: Hugh Nelson[1]
Affiliation:Republican
Final Result: [2][3]-
District of Twenty One-
Albermarle County-
Amherst County-
Fluvanna County-

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]"Mr. Hugh Nelson (Judge of the General Court) has, we understand, no competitor for the district of Albemarle, etc., lately represented by Mr. Garland." American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). April 13, 1811.
[3]"Richmond, April 9...Congressional Elections ~ No opposition is made to the re-election of Col. Goodwyn, (from the district of Dinwiddie) of Mr. Newton, (from the district of King and Queen) and of Mr. Dawson, (from the district of Spotsylvania). Mr. Gholson, we understand, will be re-elected, without opposition, for the district of Brunswick, etc. All competition has ceased in this district ~ and Mr. CLopton will, of course be re-elected without opposition. Mr. James Pleasant will be elected for the district of Goochland, etc. without opposition. Mr. Hugh Neson (Judge of the General Court) has, we understand, no competitor for the district of Albemarle, etc. lately represented by Mr. Garland. All of the above are firm men and true!" The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 9, 1811.

References:

The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 9, 1811.
American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). April 13, 1811.
National Intelligencer (Washington, DC). April 13, 1811.
United States' Gazette (Philadelphia, PA). April 16, 1811.
Alexandria Daily Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA). April 23, 1811.
New-York Herald (New York, NY). April 27, 1811.
Farmer's Repository (Charlestown, WV). May 3, 1811.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.