Virginia 1811 U.S. House of Representatives, District 9

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Virginia 1811 U.S. House of Representatives, District 9
Date:
1811
State:
Virginia
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Aylett Hawes, George F. Strother
Candidates: Aylett Hawes[1]George F. Strother
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublican
Final Result: [2][3]--
District of Nine--
Culpeper County383144
Fauquier County[4]--

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]"Doct. Hylett Hawes is elected for the district of Culpepper and Fauquier, lately represented by John Love, Esquire." American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). April 30, 1811.
[3]"Doctor Aylett Hawes is elected for the district of Culpepper and Fauquier, lately represented in Congress by John Love, Esq." New-York Herald (New York, NY). May 4, 1811.
[4]"In Fauquier, Mr. Strother has a majority of 20 votes - of course, Dr. Hawes is elected." The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 30, 1811.

References:

Alexandria Daily Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA). April 29, 1811.
American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). April 30, 1811.
The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 30, 1811.
The Virginia Patriot (Richmond, VA). April 30, 1811.
American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). May 1, 1811.
Poulson's American Daily Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). May 1, 1811.
New-York Herald (New York, NY). May 4, 1811.
Fayette and Greene Spectator (Uniontown, PA). May 16, 1811.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.