Virginia 1813 U.S. House of Representatives, District 10

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Virginia 1813 U.S. House of Representatives, District 10
Date:
1813
State:
Virginia
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Aylett Hawes, Philip R. Thompson
Candidates: Aylett Hawes[1]Philip R. Thompson
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublican
Final Result: [2][3]--
District of Ten--
Culpeper County45545
Fauquier County--

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]"The popularity of doctor Hawes, goes with his merits. He is re-elected for Congress with the higest credit; for no one thought proper to shew himself as an opponent in Culpepper or Fauquier." The Alexandria Herald (Alexandria, VA). April 30, 1813.
[3]Alexandria Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA) reported these returns as being from the 9th District.

References:

The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). April 22, 1813.
The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 23, 1813.
Baltimore Patriot and Evening Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). April 27, 1813.
Alexandria Gazette, Commercial and Political (Alexandria, VA). April 29, 1813.
The Alexandria Herald (Alexandria, VA). April 30, 1813.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.