Virginia 1825 U.S. House of Representatives, District 12

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Virginia 1825 U.S. House of Representatives, District 12
Date:
1825
State:
Virginia
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Robert S. Garnett, John H. Upshaw
Candidates: Robert S. Garnett[1]John H. Upshaw
Affiliation:RepublicanFederalist
Final Result: [2]955439
District of Twelve955439
Caroline County[3]38985
Essex County15289
King and Queen County104199
King William County17948
Middlesex County13118

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]"Mr. Garnett is elected having a majority of 385 votes in the whole district." Constitutional Whig (Richmond, VA). May 6, 1825.
[3]The Constitutional Whig (Richmond, VA) lists 387 votes for Robert S. Garnett.

References:

Richmond Commercial Compiler (Richmond, VA). April 13, 1825.
The Virginia Herald (Fredericksburg, VA). April 13, 1825.
Daily National Intelligencer (Washington, DC). April 14, 1825.
Constitutional Whig (Richmond, VA). April 15, 1825.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 15, 1825.
American Commercial Beacon and Norfolk and Portsmouth Daily Advertiser (Norfolk, VA). April 18, 1825.
The Virginian (Lynchburg, VA). April 21, 1825.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 22, 1825.
Richmond Commercial Compiler (Richmond, VA). April 23, 1825.
The Virginia Herald (Fredericksburg, VA). April 23, 1825.
Richmond Commercial Compiler (Richmond, VA). April 25, 1825.
Constitutional Whig (Richmond, VA). April 26, 1825.
Richmond Commercial Compiler (Richmond, VA). April 28, 1825.
The Virginian (Lynchburg, VA). April 28, 1825.
Constitutional Whig (Richmond, VA). April 29, 1825.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 29, 1825.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). May 3, 1825.
Constitutional Whig (Richmond, VA). May 6, 1825.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). May 13, 1825.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.