Virginia 1805 U.S. House of Representatives, District 21

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Virginia 1805 U.S. House of Representatives, District 21
Date:
1805
State:
Virginia
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Thomas M. Randolph, Walter Leake
Candidates: Thomas M. Randolph[1]Walter Leake
Affiliation:RepublicanQuid
Final Result: [2][3]1175670
District of Twenty One1175670
Albermarle County503140
Amherst County390474
Fluvanna County[4]28256

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]Thomas Mann Randolph: Jefferson's Son-in-Law lists Thomas M. Randolph with "1184 out of a total of 1863 votes."
[3]"My Dearest Father, Mr. Randolph's election is almost certain, the polls stand, Albemarle T.M.R. 503 W.L. 140, Amherst T.M.R. 390 W.L. 474, which leaves Mr. Randolph a majority of 279, so that independent of his influence in Fluvanna, which is great, he is safe." Martha Jefferson Randolph to Thomas Jefferson. April 19, 1805.
[4]The Enquirer (Richmond, VA) lists 292 votes for Thomas M. Randolph.

References:

Martha Jefferson Randolph to Thomas Jefferson. April 19, 1805.
Thomas Mann Randolph, Jr. to Thomas Jefferson. April 27, 1805.
The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 16, 1805.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). April 17, 1805.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). April 29, 1805.
The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 30, 1805.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). May 6, 1805.
The Berkeley and Jefferson Intelligencer and Northern Neck Advertiser (Martinsburg, WV). May 24, 1805.
Gaines, William H. Thomas Mann Randolph: Jefferson's Son-in-Law. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1966. 58.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.