New Hampshire 1795 State Senate, District 2

Office:
State Senate (State)
Title:
State Senator
Jurisdiction:
State
Label:
New Hampshire 1795 State Senate, District 2
Date:
1795
State:
New Hampshire
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
State Senate/State Senator
Candidates:
Nathaniel Gilman, Jonathan Clark
Candidates: Nathaniel Gilman[1]Jonathan Clark
Affiliation:
Final Result: --
District of Two--
Rockingham County--
Town of Brentwood56-
Town of East Kingston--
Town of Epping587
Town of Exeter[2]155-
Town of Kensington--
Town of Kingston--
Town of Newmarket--
Town of Newton--
Town of Poplin--
Town of South Hampton--

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]The New Hampshire Gazette (Portsmouth, NH), the Oracle of the Day (Portsmouth, NH), March 4, and the Amherst Journal (Amherst, NH), March 6, report Nathaniel Gilman with 135 votes in Exeter.

References:

The New Hampshire Gazette (Portsmouth, NH). March 3, 1795.
The Oracle of the Day (Portsmouth, NH). March 4, 1795.
Amherst Journal (Amherst, NH). March 6, 1795.
American Herald of Liberty (Exeter, NH). March 7, 1795.
American Herald of Liberty (Exeter, NH). March 21, 1795.
Courier of New Hampshire (Concord, NH). May 30, 1795.
Amherst Journal (Amherst, NH). June 5, 1795.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.