Virginia 1822 State Senate, Class 1, District 6
Office:
State Senate (State)
Title:
State Senator
Jurisdiction:
State
Label:
Virginia 1822 State Senate, Class 1, District 6
Date:
1822
State:
Virginia
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
State Senate/State Senator
Candidates:
John Brown, Jr., James L. Woodville
Candidates: John Brown, Jr. James L. Woodville Affiliation: Final Result: 899 739
District of Six 899 739 Alleghany County 61 51 Bath County 151 63 Botetourt County [1] 51 309 Greenbrier County 226 41 Monroe County 68 254 Nicholas County 160 21 Pocahontas County 182 0
Notes: References: Herald of the Valley (Fincastle, VA). April 15, 1822.
Winchester Republican (Winchester, VA). April 20, 1822.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). May 21, 1822.
Herald of the Valley (Fincastle, VA). April 22, 1822.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 23, 1822.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 26, 1822.
American Commercial Beacon and Norfolk and Portsmouth Daily Advertiser (Norfolk, VA). May 3, 1822.
Herald of the Valley (Fincastle, VA). May 13, 1822.
Page Images
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society ).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society ).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society ).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society ).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society ).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society ).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society ).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society ).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society ).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society ).
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election.
These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match.
To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited.
Some original source material is available at the
American Antiquarian Society ).
These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.