North Carolina 1819 U.S. House of Representatives, District 5

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
North Carolina 1819 U.S. House of Representatives, District 5
Date:
1819
State:
North Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Charles Hooks, Samuel Stanford
Candidates: Charles Hooks[1]Samuel Stanford
Affiliation:RepublicanFederalist
Final Result: [2][3][4]27451906
District of Five27451906
Bladen County--
Brunswick County--
Columbus County--
Duplin County--
New Hanover County382303
Onslow County--
Sampson County--

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]The Carolina Centinel (New Bern, NC) lists Samuel Standford with 1806 votes.
[3]The National Intelligencer (Washington, DC) lists Charles Hooks with a majority of 889 votes.
[4]The Winyaw Intelligencer (Georgetown, SC) lists Charles Hooks with a majority of 1839 votes.

References:

Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 20, 1819.
The Star, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 20, 1819.
National Intelligencer (Washington, DC). August 24, 1819.
National Intelligencer (Washington, DC). August 25, 1819.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 27, 1819.
The Star, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 27, 1819.
Virginia Patriot, and Richmond Daily Mercantile Advertiser (Richmond, VA). August 27, 1819.
Winyaw Intelligencer (Georgetown, SC). August 28, 1819.
Carolina Centinel (New Bern, NC). September 4, 1819.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). September 7, 1819.
Hinshaw, Seth Beeson, ed. North Carolina Election Returns 1790-1866: Covering the Races for President, Governor and U.S. House. 1992. State Library of North Carolina, Raleigh.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.