South Carolina 1808 U.S. House of Representatives, District 2

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
South Carolina 1808 U.S. House of Representatives, District 2
Date:
1808
State:
South Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
William Butler, Thomas Deveaux, William Huston, A. Abergoty, Edmund Bacon, C. J. Colcock, Robert Starke
Candidates: William Butler[1]Thomas DeveauxWilliam HustonC. J. ColcockA. AbergotyRobert StarkeEdmund Bacon
Affiliation:Republican
Final Result: [2]-------
District of Two-------
District of Barnwell-------
District of Beaufort-------
Saint Helena Parish[3]5631-11
Saint Luke's Parish101------
District of Edgefield-------
Colliers[4]-------
Hardons[5]-------
John Longmires[6]-------
John Pools[7]-------
Mr. Willings[8]284---1--
Pine Woods[9]-------

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]District Two was also known as Beaufort District.
[3]The Charleston Times, 18 October 1808, lists 8 votes for Thomas Deveaux.
[4]137 voters were present at Colliers.
[5]165 voters were present at Hardons.
[6]216 voters were present at John Longmires.
[7]271 voters were present at John Pools
[8]287 voters were present at Mr. Willings.
[9]232 voters were present at Pine Woods.

References:

Original Election Returns. South Carolina Department of Archives and History, Columbia.
Original Poll Sheet. South Carolina Department of Archives and History, Columbia.
Carolina Weekly Messenger (Charleston, SC). October 18, 1808.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). October 18, 1808.
The Times (Charleston, SC). October 18, 1808.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 19, 1808.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). October 22, 1808.
The Times (Charleston, SC). October 22, 1808.
Dubin, Michael J. United States Congressional Elections, 1788-1997: The Official Results of the Elections of the 1st through 105th Congresses. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company, 1998. 41.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.