North Carolina 1816 U.S. Senate, Special, Ballot 2

Office:
U.S. Senate (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Senator
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
North Carolina 1816 U.S. Senate, Special, Ballot 2
Date:
1816
State:
North Carolina
Type:
Special
Iteration:
Second Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. Senate/U.S. Senator
Candidates:
Montfort Stokes, John Branch, John Roberts, Thomas Davis, scattering
Candidates: Montfort StokesJohn BranchJohn RobertsThomas Davisscattering
Affiliation:Republican
Final Result: [1][2]8981845
General Assembly8981845

Notes:

[1]Hutchins G. Burton withdrew from this ballot.
[2]"No person is yet chosen to fill the vacancy occasioned by the resignation of the Hon. James Turner -- Col. John Branch of Halifax, Gen. Montfort Stokes of Wilkes, Col. Hutchins G. Burton of Halifax, Gen. John Roberts of Carteret, and Gen. Thomas Davis of Fayetteville, were in nomination... 94 being a majority, no one is elected. The two houses agreed to ballot again today." The Star, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). November 29, 1816.

References:

The Raleigh Minerva (Raleigh, NC). November 29, 1816.
The Star, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). November 29, 1816.
The Republican (Petersburg, VA). December 3, 1816.
The Star, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). December 6, 1816.
The Cape-Fear Recorder (Wilmington, NC). December 7, 1816.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.