Pennsylvania 1800 State Senate, District 11

Office:
State Senate (State)
Title:
State Senator
Jurisdiction:
State
Label:
Pennsylvania 1800 State Senate, District 11
Date:
1800
State:
Pennsylvania
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
State Senate/State Senator
Candidates:
John Hamilton, John Hoge
Candidates: John Hamilton[1]John Hoge
Affiliation:RepublicanFederalist
Final Result: 42501567
District of Eleven42501567
District of Allegheny, Beaver and Butler[2]2002847
Allegheny County[3][4]989494
Elizabeth14325
Fayette/Noblesburgh14313
District of Mifflin and Saint Clair[5]17899
Pittsburgh[6][7]387306
District of Plumb and Versailles6128
Racoon[8]7723
Beaver County33867
Beaver[9]17126
Forks of Beaver7012
Georgetown9729
Butler County16443
Connequnessing11438
Slippery Rock505
Crawford County511243
District of Erie[10]--
Franklin7440
Meadville20091
Neshannock15526
Oil Creek723
Shenango and Conneaut4948
Springfield[11]2615
Greene County591264
Carmichaels16037
Jefferson11970
Waynesburgh79109
Whitely23348
Washington County[12]1657456
Burgette30534
Canonsburg30542
Hamilton's19834
Hill's9797
Urie's21527
Washington518160
West's1962

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]Beaver and Butler counties were created on March 12, 1800, from parts of Allegheny and Washington Counties, but these new counties continued to vote with Allegheny County. Crawford County, also organized in 1800, was included in the Allegheny returns for Congress, State Senator and Assembly that year.
[3]The Aurora. General Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA) reports 1054 votes for John Hamilton.
[4]The Pittsburgh Gazette (Pittsburgh, PA) reports 1802 votes for John Hamilton and 756 votes for John Hoge.
[5]The Tree of Liberty and Aurora. General Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA) report 198 votes for John Hamilton.
[6]Aurora. General Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA) reports 447 votes for John Hamilton in Pittsburgh.
[7]The Tree of Liberty reports 407 votes for John Hamilton in Pittsburgh.
[8]Aurora. General Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA) reports 74 votes for John Hamilton.
[9]The Tree of Liberty and Aurora. General Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA) report 25 votes for John Hoge.
[10]"The Erie District in Crawford County gave no votes for Congress or State Senator." Original Election Returns. Pennsylvania State Archives, Harrisburg. State Archives, Harrisburg, PA.
[11]The Tree of Liberty refers to Springfield as Lexington.
[12]The Tree of Liberty reports 1638 votes for John Hamilton and 394 votes for John Hoge.

References:

Original Election Returns. Pennsylvania State Archives, Harrisburg.
The Philadelphia Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). October 15, 1800.
Gazette of the United States and Daily Evening Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). October 20, 1800.
The Herald of Liberty (Washington, PA). October 20, 1800.
Wilkesbarre Gazette and Luzerne Advertiser (Wilkes-Barre, PA). October 21, 1800.
Norristown Herald and Weekly Advertiser (Norristown, PA). October 22, 1800.
Gazette of the United States and Daily Evening Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). October 23, 1800.
Aurora. General Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). October 23, 1800.
The Pittsburgh Gazette (Pittsburgh, PA). October 24, 1800.
The Tree of Liberty (Pittsburgh, PA). October 25, 1800.
Aurora. General Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). October 27, 1800.
The Herald of Liberty (Washington, PA). October 27, 1800.
Aurora. General Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). November 3, 1800.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.