Maryland 1803 U.S. House of Representatives, District 4

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Maryland 1803 U.S. House of Representatives, District 4
Date:
1803
State:
Maryland
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Daniel Hiester, Eli Williams, Frisby Tilghman
Candidates: Daniel Hiester[1]Eli WilliamsFrisby Tilghman
Affiliation:RepublicanFederalist
Final Result: 357123791
District of Four357123791
Allegany County[2]423539-
Town of Cumberland157171-
Glades947-
Holtzman's8059-
Old Town63114-
Simkin's1866-
Western Port[3]9682-
Frederick County[4]1594890-
Town of Buckey's-town (West)119145-
Town of Emmitsburg343325-
Town of Fredericktown478240-
Town of Middletown654180-
Washington County[5]15549501
Fiery's22844-
Town of Hagerstown915194-
Town of Hancock67104-
Town of Sharpsburgh46484-
Stover's288124-

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]The National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC) and Bartgis's Republican Gazette (Fredericktown, MD) lists Eli Williams with 530 votes, and Daniel Heister with 425 votes.
[3]Western Port was referred to as George's Creek in the October 8, 1803 edition of the Frederick-Town Herald (Fredericktown, MD).
[4]The October 7, 1803 edition of the National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser, the October 11, 1803 edition of the Republican Star, the Universal Gazette, and the October 6, 1803 edition of the Federal Gazette list 1593 for Daniel Hiester.
[5]The October 7, 1803 edition of the National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser lists Daniel Heister with 1593 votes, and Eli Williams with 890 votes, "in the part of the county attached to Washington and Allegany."

References:

Original Election Returns. Maryland State Archives, Annapolis.
The Maryland Herald, and Hager's-Town Weekly Advertiser (Hagerstown, MD). October 5, 1803.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 6, 1803.
The Telegraphe and Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 6, 1803.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). October 7, 1803.
The Frederick-Town Herald (Fredericktown, MD). October 8, 1803.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). October 10, 1803.
Republican Star or Eastern Shore General Advertiser (Easton, MD). October 11, 1803.
The Maryland Herald, and Elizabeth-Town Weekly Advertiser (Elizabethtown, MD). October 12, 1803.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). October 12, 1803.
Universal Gazette (Washington, DC). October 13, 1803.
Bartgis's Republican Gazette (Fredericktown, MD). October 14, 1803.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). October 14, 1803.
The Frederick-Town Herald (Fredericktown, MD). October 15, 1803.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.