North Carolina 1817 U.S. House of Representatives, District 9

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
North Carolina 1817 U.S. House of Representatives, District 9
Date:
1817
State:
North Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Thomas Settle, Romulus M. Saunders
Candidates: Thomas Settle[1]Romulus M. Saunders
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublican
Final Result: [2]3593990
District of Nine3593990
Caswell County--
Guilford County1500140
Rockingham County--
Stokes County572
Thomas Carr's572

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]"We have just learned that Mr. Settle received so overwhelming a majority in Guilford County, that Mr. Sanders declined continuing a poll in the other counties. The votes we are told stood about 1500 and 140." The Raleigh Minerva (Raleigh, NC). August 15, 1817.

References:

Original Election Returns. State Archives of North Carolina, Raleigh.
Governor's Papers of William Miller. Volume 5. Items 200, 202-203, 206.
Charleston Courier (Charleston, SC). August 19, 1817.
The Carolina Federal Republican (New Bern, NC). August 23, 1817.
National Intelligencer (Washington, DC). August 26, 1817.
Virginia Patriot, and Richmond Daily Mercantile Advertiser (Richmond, VA). August 28, 1817.
Virginia Patriot, and Richmond Daily Mercantile Advertiser (Richmond, VA). September 2, 1817.
Southern Patriot, and Commercial Advertiser (Charleston, SC). September 13, 1817.
Hinshaw, Seth Beeson, ed. North Carolina Election Returns 1790-1866: Covering the Races for President, Governor and U.S. House. 1992. State Library of North Carolina, Raleigh.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.