North Carolina 1804 U.S. House of Representatives, District 12

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
North Carolina 1804 U.S. House of Representatives, District 12
Date:
1804
State:
North Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Joseph Winston, Meshack Franklin
Candidates: Joseph Winston[1]Meshack Franklin
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublican
Final Result: 26812019
District of Twelve26812019
Ashe County283158
Iredell County381282
Stokes County1040217
Surry County655716
Barkers138125
Gentry's Mill178166
Oglesby's4195
Rockford111162
Up the Groves187168
Wilkes County322646
Courthouse158280
Dula's98134
Roaring River30112
Salem36120

Notes:

[1]Elected.

References:

Compiled Congressional Returns. State Archives of North Carolina, Raleigh.
Legislative Papers for 1804. State Archives of North Carolina, Raleigh.
William Lenoir Memorandum Book. May 7, 1804 - November 1, 1806. Folder 567. The Southern Historical Collection, Louis Round Wilson Special Collections Library, University of North Carolina.
Minerva; or, Anti-Jacobin (Raleigh, NC). August 13, 1804.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 13, 1804.
Minerva; or, Anti-Jacobin (Raleigh, NC). August 20, 1804.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 20, 1804.
The Enquirer (Richmond, VA). August 25, 1804.
Minerva; or, Anti-Jacobin (Raleigh, NC). August 27, 1804.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 27, 1804.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). September 1, 1804.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). September 3, 1804.
Hinshaw, Seth Beeson, ed. North Carolina Election Returns 1790-1866: Covering the Races for President, Governor and U.S. House. 1992. State Library of North Carolina, Raleigh.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.