North Carolina 1810 U.S. House of Representatives, District 9

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
North Carolina 1810 U.S. House of Representatives, District 9
Date:
1810
State:
North Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
James Cochrane, Theophilus Lacy
Candidates: James Cochrane[1]Theophilus Lacy
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublican
Final Result: 31162354
District of Nine31162354
Caswell County688431
Guilford County630761
Person County57739
Randolph County871334
Rockingham County350789

Notes:

[1]Elected.

References:

Compiled Congressional Returns. State Archives of North Carolina, Raleigh.
The Raleigh Minerva (Raleigh, NC). August 16, 1810.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 16, 1810.
The Carolina Federal Republican (New Bern, NC). August 18, 1810.
The Raleigh Minerva (Raleigh, NC). August 23, 1810.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 23, 1810.
The Star (Raleigh, NC). August 23, 1810.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). August 28, 1810.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). August 29, 1810.
The Raleigh Minerva (Raleigh, NC). August 30, 1810.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). August 30, 1810.
The Star (Raleigh, NC). August 30, 1810.
The Raleigh Minerva (Raleigh, NC). September 6, 1810.
Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina State Gazette (Raleigh, NC). September 6, 1810.
Hinshaw, Seth Beeson, ed. North Carolina Election Returns 1790-1866: Covering the Races for President, Governor and U.S. House. 1992. State Library of North Carolina, Raleigh.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.