Ohio 1820 U.S. House of Representatives, District 5

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Ohio 1820 U.S. House of Representatives, District 5
Date:
1820
State:
Ohio
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Joseph Vance, Philemon Beecher, Orris Parrish, Daniel Smith, John Kilbourn
Candidates: Joseph Vance[1]Philemon BeecherOrris ParrishDaniel SmithJohn Kilbourn
Affiliation:
Final Result: [2]-----
District of Five-----
Champaign County8304422--
Clark County[3]497-116--
Darke County60210---
Delaware County449-139--
Fairfield County227966-676-
5121-19-
Franklin County5305192152129
Licking County7403319016-
Logan County-----
Madison County-----
Miami County152411---
Montgomery County12510793-3
Butler1502-1
Dayton4394---
German83137---
Jackson663---
Jefferson-91--1
Madison-62--1
Perry16----
Randolph-311--
Washington14197---
Wayne154---
Perry County[4]145319-27-
Shelby County615929--
Green17----
Loramie--29--
Orange2314---
Perry1213---
Turtle Creek932---
Union County-----
Wood County-----

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]"General Joseph Vance the late elected member of Congress for this district, we understand had a majority of 201 votes over General Beecher." Ohio Monitor (Columbus, OH). November 18, 1820.
[3]The Delaware Patron (Delaware, OH) reports 479 votes for Joseph Vance in Clark County. October 2, 1822.
[4]Returns from 3 townships only (including Somerset).

References:

Abstract of Votes, Montgomery County.
Original Shelby County Election Returns.
Muskingum Messenger (Zanesville, OH). October 17, 1820.
The Ohio Watchman (Dayton, OH). October 17, 1820.
Franklin Chronicle (Worthington, OH). October 23, 1820.
The Ohio Watchman (Dayton, OH). October 24, 1820.
Franklin Chronicle (Worthington, OH). October 30, 1820.
Ohio Monitor (Columbus, OH). November 18, 1820.
Delaware Patron and Franklin Chronicle (Delaware, OH). October 2, 1822.
Mikesell, Shirley Keller, ed. Early Settlers of Montgomery County, Ohio. Vol. III. Bowie, MD: Heritage Books, 1993. 104.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.