North Carolina 1810 U.S. Senate

Office:
U.S. Senate (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Senator
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
North Carolina 1810 U.S. Senate
Date:
1810
State:
North Carolina
Type:
Legislative
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. Senate/U.S. Senator
Candidates:
David Stone, James Turner, Benjamin Smith, Thomas Davis, blank
Candidates: David StoneJames TurnerBenjamin SmithThomas Davisblank
Affiliation:
Final Result: [1][2][3]784932262
General Assembly784932262

Notes:

[1]"A message was received from the Senate, informing the house of their readiness to ballot for a Senator.... The balloting committee for a Senator reported that the votes were, for David Stone - 78; James Turner - 49; Benjamin Smith - 35; Thomas Davis - 28. Of course, no choice was made." The True Republican, and Newbern Weekly Advertiser (New Bern, NC). December 5, 1810.
[2]"A balloting for a senator of the United States took place -- James Turner, David Stone, Benj. Smith, and Thos. Davis were in nomination. State of the Poll -- Stone - 78; Turner - 49; Smith - 33; Davis - 26 -- No majority." The Star (Raleigh, NC). November 29, 1810.
[3]This the first of three ballots, cast over three days. First Ballot cast November 26th; second ballot on the 27th; third on the 28th.

References:

Legislative Papers. State Archives of North Carolina, Raleigh.
The Star (Raleigh, NC). November 29, 1810.
The True Republican, and Newbern Weekly Advertiser (New Bern, NC). December 5, 1810.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.