Virginia 1825 U.S. House of Representatives, District 7

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Virginia 1825 U.S. House of Representatives, District 7
Date:
1825
State:
Virginia
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Nathaniel H. Claiborne, Jabez Leftwich
Candidates: Nathaniel H. Claiborne[1]Jabez Leftwich
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublican
Final Result: [2]--
District of Seven--
Bedford County[3]45970
Franklin County64078
Henry County135122
Patrick County--
Court House46040

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]"Nathaniel H. Claiborne has been chosen a Representative in Congress from the State of Virginia, from the Lynchburg District, by a majority, in the whole, of 78 votes over Jabez Leftwich, the late Representative." Daily National Intelligencer (Washington, DC). May 7, 1825.
[3]The Constitutional Whig (Richmond, VA), May 3, lists the first day's votes as: 636 votes for Jabez Leftwich and 43 votes for Nathaniel H. Claiborne.

References:

Martinsburgh Gazette (Martinsburg, WV). April 14, 1825.
The Virginian (Lynchburg, VA). April 14, 1825.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 15, 1825.
American Commercial Beacon and Norfolk and Portsmouth Daily Advertiser (Norfolk, VA). April 18, 1825.
The Virginia Herald (Fredericksburg, VA). April 20, 1825.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 22, 1825.
Richmond Commercial Compiler (Richmond, VA). April 23, 1825.
Constitutional Whig (Richmond, VA). April 26, 1825.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). April 26, 1825.
American Commercial Beacon and Norfolk and Portsmouth Daily Advertiser (Norfolk, VA). May 2, 1825.
The Virginian (Lynchburg, VA). May 2, 1825.
Constitutional Whig (Richmond, VA). May 3, 1825.
Constitutional Whig (Richmond, VA). May 6, 1825.
Richmond Commercial Compiler (Richmond, VA). May 6, 1825.
Richmond Enquirer (Richmond, VA). May 6, 1825.
Daily National Intelligencer (Washington, DC). May 7, 1825.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.