Virginia 1803 U.S. House of Representatives, District 18

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Virginia 1803 U.S. House of Representatives, District 18
Date:
1803
State:
Virginia
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
Peterson Goodwyn, James Jones
Candidates: Peterson Goodwyn[1]James Jones
Affiliation:RepublicanRepublican
Final Result: 839415
District of Eighteen839415
Dinwiddie County[2][3]46350
Greenville County20846
Nottoway County9246
Prince George County15973

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]"The votes in this district for a Representative to Congress, stand, at present as follows: Nottoway: Goodwyn 9, Jones 246; Greenville: Goodwyn 208, Jones 46; Prince George: Goodwyn 159, Jones 73. The present majority for Col. Goodwyn is eleven. Monday next is the day of the election in Dinwiddie, when it will be ascertained who is the successful candidate." Chronicle, May 1803; and, Petersburg Intelligencer (Petersburg, VA), April 15, 1803.
[3]"On Monday last the election for Dinwiddie county took place. At the close of the poll the votes were as follow...Goodwyn...is therefore elected by a majority of 424." The Republican (Petersburg, VA). April 22, 1803.

References:

Petersburg Intelligencer (Petersburg, VA). April 15, 1803.
The Republican (Petersburg, VA). April 22, 1803.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). April 27, 1803.
Alexandria Advertiser and Commercial Intelligencer (Alexandria, VA). April 29, 1803.
Salem Register (Salem, MA). May 12, 1803.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.