Maryland 1810 U.S. House of Representatives, District 6

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Maryland 1810 U.S. House of Representatives, District 6
Date:
1810
State:
Maryland
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
John Montgomery, Thomas G. Moffit, Stevenson Archer, James Moffitt, John Moffitt, William Spencer, James Steel
Candidates: John Montgomery[1]Thomas G. MoffitStevenson ArcherJames MoffittJohn MoffittWilliam SpencerJames Steel
Affiliation:Republican
Final Result: 28775031111
District of Six28775031111
Cecil County1022------
Town of Charlestown104------
Town of Elkton600------
Rising Sun228------
Warwick90------
Harford County13455031111
Town of Abingdon187----1-
Bel Air20336-11--
Town of Dublin3324----1
Hall's Cross Roads346------
Marshall's277103----
Kent County510--1---
District of One164------
District of Two171------
District of Three175--1---

Notes:

[1]Elected.

References:

Original Election Certificate. Maryland State Archives, Annapolis.
Kent County Pollbooks. Maryland State Archives, Annapolis.
Election Transcript. Historical Society of Harford County, Bel Air.
Baltimore Evening Post (Baltimore, MD). October 3, 1810.
American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 4, 1810.
Baltimore Whig (Baltimore, MD). October 4, 1810.
American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 5, 1810.
Baltimore Whig (Baltimore, MD). October 5, 1810.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). October 5, 1810.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). October 8, 1810.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). October 8, 1810.
The Maryland Herald, and Hager's-Town Weekly Advertiser (Hagerstown, MD). October 10, 1810.
Universal Gazette (Washington, DC). October 11, 1810.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.