Virginia 1803 U.S. House of Representatives, District 2

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
Virginia 1803 U.S. House of Representatives, District 2
Date:
1803
State:
Virginia
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
James Stephenson, Osborn Sprigg
Candidates: James Stephenson[1]Osborn Sprigg
Affiliation:FederalistRepublican
Final Result: 984853
District of Two984853
Berkeley County[2][3]384262
Hampshire County378400
Jefferson County[4]222191

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]The Virginia Telegraphe, and Rockbridge Courier (Lexington, VA) lists 263 votes for Osborn Sprigg.
[3]Hudson Gazette (Hudson, NY) and The Albany Centinel (Albany, NY) lists 388 votes for Stephenson.
[4]Hudson Gazette (Hudson, NY) lists 322 votes for James Stephenson.

References:

North American, and Commercial Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). March 17, 1809.
Alexandria Advertiser and Commercial Intelligencer (Alexandria, VA). April 15, 1803.
The Berkeley and Jefferson Intelligencer and Northern Neck Advertiser (Martinsburg, WV). April 15, 1803.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). April 16, 1803.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). April 18, 1803.
The True American and Commercial Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). April 19, 1803.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). April 25, 1803.
The Republican; or, Anti-Democrat (Baltimore, MD). April 25, 1803.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). April 26, 1803.
The Virginia Telegraphe, and Rockbridge Courier (Lexington, VA). April 26, 1803.
American Citizen (New York, NY). April 29, 1803.
The Berkeley and Jefferson Intelligencer and Northern Neck Advertiser (Martinsburg, WV). April 29, 1803.
Poulson's American Daily Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). April 29, 1803.
Washington Federalist (Georgetown, DC). April 29, 1803.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). April 30, 1803.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). May 2, 1803.
Alexandria Advertiser and Commercial Intelligencer (Alexandria, VA). May 3, 1803.
Hudson Gazette (Hudson, NY). May 3, 1803.
Federal Gazette and Baltimore Daily Advertiser (Baltimore, MD). May 4, 1803.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). May 4, 1803.
The Virginia Gazette, and General Advertiser (Richmond, VA). May 4, 1803.
National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser (Washington, DC). May 6, 1803.
Poulson's American Daily Advertiser (Philadelphia, PA). May 6, 1803.
The Republican; or, Anti-Democrat (Baltimore, MD). May 6, 1803.
Gazette of the United States (Philadelphia, PA). May 7, 1803.
American Citizen (New York, NY). May 10, 1803.
The Scioto Gazette (Chillicothe, OH). May 14, 1803.
Hudson Gazette (Hudson, NY). May 17, 1803.
The Virginia Telegraphe, and Rockbridge Courier (Lexington, VA). May 17, 1803.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). May 18, 1803.
The Recorder (Richmond, VA). May 18, 1803.
The Albany Centinel (Albany, NY). May 20, 1803.
The Virginia Argus (Richmond, VA). May 21, 1803.
The Virginia Gazette, and General Advertiser (Richmond, VA). May 21, 1803.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.