North Carolina 1800 U.S. House of Representatives, District 10

Office:
U.S. House of Representatives (Federal)
Title:
U.S. Congressman
Jurisdiction:
Federal
Label:
North Carolina 1800 U.S. House of Representatives, District 10
Date:
1800
State:
North Carolina
Type:
General
Iteration:
First Ballot
Office/Role:
U.S. House of Representatives/U.S. Congressman
Candidates:
John Stanly, Richard D. Spaight
Candidates: John Stanly[1]Richard D. Spaight
Affiliation:FederalistRepublican
Final Result: [2][3]25551699
District of Ten25551699
Carteret County123268
Craven County356565
Greene County207103
Hyde County316201
Germantown9780
Mattamuskett10388
Pantego11633
Johnston County36992
Jones County39886
Lenoir County209168
Wayne County577216

Notes:

[1]Elected.
[2]In September, 1802, John Stanly would kill Richard D. Spaight in a duel over statements made in this election. North Carolina subsequently banned dueling.
[3]"Richard Dobbs Spaight is what they call in North Carolina a spurious federalist, in opposition to a real or true one, such as Mr. Stanley who is elected in his stead." The New-York Gazette and General Advertiser (New York, NY). September 11, 1800.

References:

Original Election Certificate. State Archives of North Carolina, Raleigh.
John S. West to John G. Blount. August 18, 1800.
The North-Carolina Minerva, and Raleigh Advertiser (Raleigh, NC). August 19, 1800.
The North-Carolina Mercury, and Salisbury Advertiser (Salisbury, NC). August 21, 1800.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). August 26, 1800.
The North-Carolina Minerva, and Raleigh Advertiser (Raleigh, NC). August 26, 1800.
The Raleigh Register, and North-Carolina Weekly Advertiser (Raleigh, NC). August 26, 1800.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). August 27, 1800.
The Centinel of Liberty, or George-town and Washington Advertiser (Georgetown, DC). September 2, 1800.
City Gazette and Daily Advertiser (Charleston, SC). September 3, 1800.
The Times; and District of Columbia Daily Advertiser (Alexandria, VA). September 5, 1800.
The Centinel of Liberty, or George-town and Washington Advertiser (Georgetown, DC). September 9, 1800.
The New-York Gazette and General Advertiser (New York, NY). September 11, 1800.
Hinshaw, Seth Beeson, ed. North Carolina Election Returns 1790-1866: Covering the Races for President, Governor and U.S. House. 1992. State Library of North Carolina, Raleigh.

Page Images

handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).
handwritten notes
Phil's original notebook pages that were used to compile this election. These notes are considered a draft of the electronic version. Therefore, the numbers may not match. To verify numbers you will need to check the original sources cited. Some original source material is available at the American Antiquarian Society).

These election records were released on 11 January 2012. Versions numbers are assigned by state. Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia are complete and are in Version 1.0. All other states are in a Beta version. For more information go to the about page.